Archive for December, 2006

Calories, Schmalories

So, of course we’re all suffering through the usual barrage of fitness ads and diet program come-ons that arrive with the new year.  We know in our hearts that this is the year we’re going to get serious about exercising, watch what we eat (and drink!) and lose those extra pounds.  Yeah, right…

Inevitably, we ended up talking about this stuff at family gatherings over the holidays. And then we got to talking about the ever-increasing alcohols in wine when they asked me what I’d been writing about at work lately (see post called “Are High Alcohols a Trend?”).  My clan was completely oblivious to the trend.  I wondered aloud if there’s a connection between higher alcohols and weight gain.  You see, over the last several years, little by little, I’ve put on a few pounds that I can’t seem to shake.  My eating habits haven’t changed and, if anything, I get more exercise now than ever.  Mom says I’m probably just getting old (Thanks, Mom!).

So now, it’s stuck in my craw and I’ve got to find out how much the calories increase as the alcohol rises.  Most sites just tell you that a 4-ounce glass of wine has about 80 calories, but they don’t account for the variability of the alcohol.  Then, as I became increasingly obsessed, I ran across this nifty formula from wineintro.com:  Multiply 1.6 x the percentage of alcohol x the number of ounces.

A few strokes on the calculator later I’ve learned that if you drank a 4-ounce glass of Napa Valley Zinfandel that was made in the ’70s and was probably about 12% alcohol it had 77 calories.  If you drink a 2004 Zinfandel that’s maybe around 15 or 16% it has around 100 calories.  If you share a bottle of this Zinfandel with your significant other on a daily basis you’re taking in 80 calories more today than you were in the 70s.

woman upset on scaleSo, unless you’re exercising 80 calories-worth more than you were back in the day, you may be putting on weight as a result.  According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, if you eat 100 more food calories a day than you burn, you’ll gain about 1 pound in a month. 12 pounds a year?  !!?� !*%%#!!!  At least that hasn’t happened (yet!)

One of the many reasons I love my sister is that, along with a lot of other people, she thinks wine isn’t fattening (YES!)  This completely charming group of people say that cutting wine from the diet never results in weight loss for them.  Oh, how I want to believe!  This additional information, from wineintro is somewhat encouraging: “Unlike most foods, alcohol is processed by your liver. What the liver does is take in the alcohol and convert it to acetate… And your body enjoys burning acetate as a fuel source. So while this acetate won’t make you fat, your body is now choosing to burn that acetate instead of burning the fat you already have in your system.”  Hmmm… Kinda sounds like it all comes out in the wash.

I see 3 very simple options:

#1: Drink less wine (hmphh!)

#2: According to caloriecontrol.org, all I have to do to offset the extra 80 calories is to take a brisk walk for 15 minutes.  Now THAT’S do-able!

#3: Believe my husband when he says he likes the extra curves.  ;-)

I think I’ll go with door #3.  How about you?  Happy New Year!!!

Q: How to Pronounce Shiraz?

Question from Chris:  The varietal Syrah is pronounced Syr-RAH by Americans and SYR-a by Austrailians; similarly, we say Shir-AHZ and they say Shir-AZ. Is one correct and one incorrect, or is it simply a case of toe-MAH-toe and toe-MAY-toe?  Merry Christmas!

Answer:  And a belated merry Christmas to you, Chris! I think you hit the nail on the head - it’s a case of to-may-to, to-mah-to. Syrah’s origins have been the subject of much debate. Some have associated it with Syracuse in Sicily and others to Shiraz of Ancient Persia, thinking the Crusaders could have brought it back in their saddle bags. The current thinking is that it’s indigenous to the northern Rhone. Stay tuned!

I hope this is helpful to you. Cheers! Nancy

Are High Alcohols a Trend?

Tom Wark wrote an interesting post on the high alcohol trend. At the end of the post he wondered if the growing concern expressed within the industry will spread to the consumer. I think so. I certainly hope so. It seems like the topics that consume wine industry insiders eventually make their way to the consumer.

There was a fascinating article in Wine Business Monthly by George Vierra a year or two ago, that has stayed with me. He was voicing his concern about the high alcohol trend in relation to enjoying wine with food. If, for some reason, you have any doubt that things have changed all that much, take a look at these amazing statistics:  “Everybody knows the style of wines being produced in California has changed drastically in the past 30 years. In the Napa Valley, in 1971, the grapes were picked at an average of 20.5 Brix. In 2001, the grapes were picked at a Napa Valley average of 24.2 Brix. Average alcohols rose from 12.5 percent to 14.8 percent in 30 years. In the wines, the acid fell and the pH climbed. But, the Robert Parker/Wine Spectator ratings climbed.”  I don’t much care for the way he proposes to categorize wines. I think most of us can determine how the wine should be used on our own, but he makes some good observations.

pickers picking wine grapesred wine grapesTesting Brix

I remember talking with an excellent winemaker I admire very much about this article and the whole “hang-time” thing a year or so ago. She kind of tsk’d and said that George, a winemaking veteran, isn’t in step with industry evolution and indicated that if we pick grapes at more moderate sugars we’re going to have green, harsh characteristics. We need to wait for “physiological ripeness” and hang the sugar. So, a decade ago, we were all drinking green California wine? That’s not my recollection.

There are a couple of things at work now that weren’t in the picture a few decades ago.  One is that we did so much replanting in the’80s and 90s, due to phylloxera, that we have younger, healthier vines that are more efficient at converting light to sugar and that all the vertical shoot positioning just encourages them.

And Bob Pepi reminded me that yeast strains have been “cleaned up” over the last few decades and are also more efficient in terms of alcohol conversion. A few decades ago about 51 or 52% of the sugar would convert to alcohol. Now, it’s more like 59-61%. I wish our conversation hadn’t been cut short before I got to ask him why we don’t select yeasts with a lower conversion rate. Are they otherwise inferior?

I enjoy a blockbuster red as much as the next person, but it’s just too bad that it’s gotten to the point that I can’t order a bottle of Zinfandel without checking the alcohol before the server opens it. I love Zin, but not with my baby-back ribs if it’s 17%! And it really bugs me to see cold-climate wines with hefty alcohols, presumably to score big with powerful wine writers.

A chef-friend told me that he sees the beginnings of a push-back coming from restaurateurs. Accomplished chefs are fed up with monster wines that out-shout their efforts when they reach the plate. That’s a good start.

Adding momentum: grower push-back. As this trend has unfolded they’ve watched their revenues shrink just as their grapes do on the vine while the winemaker “waits for the flavors”.  Understandably, their patience is shriveling up along with their profits. Based upon recent discussion there’s a very strong possibility that winemakers and vintners may have to pony-up for these super-ripe grapes, at least in Napa Valley.

And just a day or two ago there was an article in the San Francisco Chronicle about a trend toward big, beefy Pinot Noirs with high alcohols. The sommeliers quoted seem to think that these big Pinots are pleasing to inexperienced consumers, but don’t taste very much like Pinot and aren’t nearly as versatile with food as the classic style with its characteristic elegance and subtlety. There were also comments about the sense of place diminishing as the alcohol and body of the wine increase.

I like to think we’re going through a phase, and I agree with Tom that it has a lot to do with wine ratings. And I’m inclined to think that this reliance on the scores is a symptom of our inexperience (relatively speaking) as new world producers and consumers (now don’t jump all over me -I know that old-world producers care about the ratings too!)

As wonderful as the wines are, the local industry is still finding its way, and I’ve seen the pendulum take wide swings regarding our attitudes and theories about how to grow and produce “world-class” wine in my 2-plus decades in the biz. Remember the “food wines” of the 80s? Those lean, elegant, “food-friendly” wines? Well, those wines weren’t any fun and went the way of the do-do bird pretty quickly.

In my humble opinion, the pendulum has swung too far and now, 2 decades later, we’re in this fruit-bombs phase. At some point, as we mature, surely we’ll strike a balance. They’ve had centuries to figure out this stuff in the old country, but even they’re still learning. That’s the thing about wine. You can never learn enough. But learn we will, and that’s great news because the wines can only get better and better as a result.

Nature or Nurture - Second Thoughts

So, I’ve been thinking, drinking and reading since my last post and have run across some interesting material to continue our ponderance.

Here’s a straight-on opinion from wine guru Bob Pepi, who also happens to be a consulting winemaker for Goosecross: “The best wines begin in the vineyard culminating in the single most important decision the winemaker can make, when to pick.”

Winemaker

Wine Vine

There was a short, interesting article about the significance of yeast selection in physorg.com “Our research clearly shows that the yeast strains used during alcoholic fermentation play a significant role in determining the colour, aroma, mouthfeel and overall flavour of Shiraz,” according to Associate Professor Skurray of University of Western Sydney. “…different strains of yeast can produce different wine smells, such as blackberry and plum, or black pepper and other spice aromas.”  While we’re on the subject, why is it that almost every time you read an article on wine research, it’s being done by the Aussies?

Winemaker with wine

And the August issue of Wine Business Monthly had an in-depth article on choosing the best yeast for Chardonnay. Along with advice about vigor, alcohol tolerance and good choices for barrel vs. tank fermentation they made recommendations about which yeasts would bring out the fruity or floral or give the wine a better mouthfeel.

Winemaker Tasting

Then, there was this fascinating article by Lance Cutler, again in Wine Business Monthly, on barrel profiling and how it can influence whether your wine shows more coconut or coffee bean or tobacco. He contends that “Aside from grapes themselves, nothing influences the aroma and flavor of wine as much as oak barrels.”  He may be in for a debate with the yeast producers.

Winemaker thief

So, we’ve got terroir, picking at the right time, selecting the right yeast vs. wild fermentation, matching the barrels to the wine in the best possible way…anyone else care to weigh in?

In the industry we love to say “When you’ve got great fruit, get out of the way”  and talk about being non-interventionist and all that. And it’s certainly true that you don’t want to over manipulate great fruit any more than you should over work the buttery dough for pie crust.  But it matters whether you sort. It matters how you crush, if you cold-soak and what press you use and when. It matters whether you pump-over and aerate or punch down. Blending REALLY matters. These and the other myriad decisions along the way make the difference between a wine that’s pleasant and a wine you remember for years to come. So, maybe our friend in Provence had a good point. During the intense discussion about terroir that’s taken place over the last several years perhaps we’ve lost sight of the indelible impact the winemaker makes. Jon Bonne’s assertion that house style trumps terroir when it comes to sparkling wine was a good reminder. Terroir can take you only so far. People, in concert with nature, make great wine.

Hillside Vineyard

Nature or Nurture?

Of course, there’s been enough written about terroir to overload a landfill and permanently blur the vision. Soil, climate and whatever else you choose to include in your personal definition of terroir are obviously going to be the single biggest influence on the wine’s character and quality.

Snob

But, as we know very well, you can give a winemaker great fruit and he can still manage to produce a stunningly offensive bottle of wine. The winemaker is a V.V.I.I.P.P. in the process.

Since Champagne and sparkling wine are my favorite weaknesses (see Napa Valley Wine Radio, episode 31), I was fascinated by this article by Jon Bonne in the San Francisco Chronicle. He concludes that for sparkling wine, technique trumps terroir. My limited experience makes me tend to agree. I remember back in the 80s, when domestic sparkling wine was really starting to take hold, my wine buddies and I would hold blind tastings as frequently as our pocketbooks would allow. Part of the routine was to guess if the wine was California or French. Pas de probleme! ;) These tastings always made an inexperienced taster like me feel like a genius! The California wines always seemed sweeter, simpler and fruitier than Champagne and were ridiculously easy to identify.

Lots has happened since then and there are some wonderful California-style sparklers that aren’t so simple now. They’re absolutely lovely, and identifiably not Champagne. But there are some real ringers out there too. My favorite domestic bubbly is Roederer Anderson Valley, and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve thought it’s French when it’s served blind, especially the L’Ermitage. A few other local bubblies have tripped me up too.

Sparkling Wine

Last year I was fortunate to attend a Champagne/sparkling wine seminar with Karen MacNeil, and part of our experience was a blind tasting in which we ranked the wines most to least favorite and with the “name the origin” game thrown in too. Out of six wines, my 1 and 2 rankings were Roederer Brut Premier Champagne and Roederer Anderson Valley Brut. I though they were both Champagne. I think the terroir for me, in this case, is Roederer! But, I have to say that most of the group thought the Anderson Valley was Champers too. Somehow Roederer has figured out how to get that toasty, biscuit-like nose and what Ms. MacNeil refers to as an enticing “contrapuntal tension” between the creamy richness and the bracing acidity from two very different “terroirs”.

I don’t know if our cheeks were a little warm and pink from the wine or from our embarrassment (it’s so hard to spit Champagne!), but we managed to botch the identity of a few other wines, too, which says something about how techniques have evolved here in California in the last few decades.  You may or may not feel that the growing similarity between Champagne and local bubblies is a good thing, but since I can often get the Anderson Valley Brut on sale at Safeway for $16.99 vs. $40.00 for the Brut Premier, I’m grateful for these advances in technique!

When Colleen, our proprietor, and I were in Provence awhile back (see post called Culinary Getaways a la Provencal) one of the winery owners we met commented that he thinks too much emphasis is placed on terroir and not enough credit is given to the winemaker. He went on to regale us with a story about how a group of Master Sommeliers held a tasting of Merlot from several continents with a common denominator of Michel Rolland, the famous wine consultant, as the consulting winemaker (my apologies to those who’ve heard me tell this story before). These highly experienced tasters got it all wrong. They thought the Chilean wine was Bordeaux and the Italian wine was from Napa Valley. Their terroir was Rolland.

Sparkling Wine Rack

Maybe some styles of wine are more about technique than others. Sparkling wine has sooooo many steps compared to still wine production, I don’t understand why anyone makes it (but I’m infinitely grateful they do!). Also, the grapes are significantly less mature at harvest, so perhaps some sense of terroir is lost there too. But that doesn’t explain the Rolland story above. Guess we’ll have to keep drinking and thinking! Cheers!

Popping Sparkling Cork

Bottling Day at Goosecross!

So often when folks come for a tour, they wonder where we’re hiding the bottling line.

Well, it’s hidden in a truck that comes for a visit from time to time. Like so many wineries of our size, we don’t have a bottling line. This is a side of winemaking you might not think about unless you’re in the biz, but wineries spawn lots of related industries and one of them is mobile bottling.

The first time I saw it in action I was completely amazed. How do they do that? A huge truck backs up onto your property, they open the back doors, and inside it looks just like the inside of a winery. Beautiful stainless-steel equipment: filler, corker, labeler, it’s all there. Ryan-McGee has their crew, we have ours, and we team up to get the job done. Since bottling is their sole enterprise, the handful of companies who offer this service in the U.S. generally do a top notch job. Like many things wine, this concept was adopted from the Europeans and has been going on here since 1978.

Why?? Bottling equipment is extremely costly and it just doesn’t make sense for a company like ours, which makes about 9000 cases of wine a year, to dedicate the space or invest in equipment we’d only use maybe 5 days out of the whole year. But, even large wineries sometimes get some help from mobile bottlers when they experiment with a new format, for instance going to screw caps for the first time. It would cost tens of thousands of dollars to add that component to the existing bottling line, so some of them choose to call the mobile bottlers instead.

This is an exciting day for us because we’re bottling the first of our wines from the 2006 harvest. We’re not quite as quick as Beaujolais Nouveau, but we make 3 white wines, Viognier, Sauvignon Blanc and Chenin Blanc, that taste best to us without the influence of oak. Consequently, we bottle them now, give them several weeks time to recover from “bottle shock” and they’ll be in your hands by some time in January. Perfect timing. These lively, vibrant wines are meant to be consumed in their youth, so down the hatch and enjoy!

Q: Wine Specialist vs. Wine Educator?

Question from Terri:  Ms. Hawks Miller could you please tell me what is the difference between a wine specialist and a wine educator?

Answer:  Hi, Terri!  What an interesting question!  I wonder if you’re contemplating a career as a wine specialist or educator.  If so, please let me know, because I can steer you toward several excellent certification programs.

There’s no official difference that I’m aware of, but in common use, I associate the title “Wine Specialist” with a sales position.  For instance a huge distribution company carries wine, beer and spirits and they use the title “Wine Specialist” to tell you that this person is knowledgeable about wine specifically and may not handle beer or spirits. Retailers may use the title to indicate that the person on the floor is much more than a clerk and is there to help you make a selection.

A “Wine Educator” is usually working more in a marketing, PR or customer relations capacity but, again, there’s no rule.  There are certified Wine Educators who may work for wineries or distributors in order to educate their accounts about the wine, thus encouraging sales.  Sometimes they work as Sommeliers or as wine buyers for retailers. Many wineries have several “wine educators”, with varying levels of expertise, on staff to serve wine and conduct seminars for the wine trade and for the public.

So, I think we’re talking semantics!  I hope this was helpful!  Cheers! Nancy

Q: What is Meant by Fruit-forward?

Question from Mitchell: What does it mean when a wine is described as being “fruit foward”?
 

Answer:  Hi, Mitchell.  Thanks for writing!  We do use that phrase casually, don’t we?  In my opinion, it’s meant to convey that the wine is very noticeably fruity and that the fruit is more noticeable than any other of the wine’s attributes.  For instance, I would say that Goosecross Chardonnay is fruit-forward or fruit-driven compared to many Chardonnays that show lots of butter and oak.  We avoid the technique that causes the buttery aroma, malo-lactic fermentation, and we go easy on the oak.  Some rich styles of Chardonnay smell mainly of oak or very richly of butter or butterscotch and they would not be described as fruit forward.

California wines tend to be more fruit-forward than their cold-climate European counterparts, for instance a Napa Valley Cabernet will usually be noticeably fruitier than a Cabernet from the Bordeaux region, which may have more earthiness or even a gravelly aroma, so that you have to look harder for the fruit.

I hope that makes sense for you.  Thanks again for writing!  Cheers!  Nancy


Join Our Mailing List
Email:
Visit Goosecross.com

Podcast Feeds

Napa Valley Wine Radio Podcast


Goosecross Cellars
We're in Yountville... "The Heart" of Napa Valley
1119 State Lane, Yountville, CA 94599 * 707.944.1986
Open - 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. daily - (800) 276-9210

Goosecross®, Goosecreek®, State Lane®, Napa Valley Wine Radio®, NVWR®,
Goosecross University™, AmerItal® and ÆROS® are registered trademarks in use by Goosecross Cellars, a California Corporation.
Copyright © 1985-2008 Goosecross Cellars, all rights reserved. (800) 276-9210 or (707) 944-1986
Wineries of Napa Valley | Napa Valley | Contact | Wine Country | Policies | Recipes | Product Catalog

Napa Valley Wine Radio is powered by WordPress 2.3.3 and K2 and (mt)
RSS Entries and RSS Comments